🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to reinitiate nuclear discussions with Washington provided that it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat stated only diplomacy worked, and shared new appeals had come from mediators to restart negotiations with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is walking a challenging path since Iran does not want appear to be acting from a position of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more powerful militarily and mentally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the impasse in the previous talks.

Prior Discussions Abruptly Ended

The earlier sessions of discussions between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with the American leader claiming the facilities had been obliterated. Subsequently, Western states exercised their right to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the discussions that American atomic experts could work on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Officials claimed repeatedly they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Present Situation

Iran's diplomats declared the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be resurrected in some form if discussions restart.

The US president recently stated he had been getting signals that Iran sought to resume discussions, but confidentially Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from the United States either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran says diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Stance

In his speech to the conference, intended to portray the US as a dominant force that misuses the idea of global regulations, the foreign minister said the two-week conflict demonstrated the conflict could not be ended by military means. He asserted the assaults started with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and ended with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making faith difficult to restore.

Diplomacy Continues the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always sought to impose their demands during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be alive and remains the final resolution to settle disagreements, but its standards, rules and tenets must be followed."

"In case they talk to the nation of Iran with the language of respect and respect, they will receive a reply in the same tone."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the struggle of recovery and reconstruction, Araghchi claimed he was assured Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We gained multiple understandings from this conflict; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He added: "We managed to survive this war. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to eliminate, stays intact. The sites and machinery, if eliminated, will be restored; what is essential is the will of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but did not succeed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have grown more resilient, more united, and more backing of the administration and the country in the aftermath of this invasion."